Albert A. Erkel

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

PLACER · 25 rulings ingested

Compare to another judge

Ruling distribution

rulings

Granted28%

Denied12%

Continued28%

Other32%

Prevailing party

determined

Plaintiff70%

Defendant20%

Mixed10%

At a glance

Grant rate28%

Denial rate12%

Continuance rate28%

First seenMay 1, 2026

Most recentAug 13, 2026

Motion type breakdown

Motion to Compel Discovery

Other

Motion to Compel Further Responses

Motion for Sanctions

Motion to Quash

Granted

Denied

Continued

Other

Statewide patterns:Motions to Compel Discovery →Motions to Compel Further Discovery Responses →Motions for Sanctions →Motions to Quash →

Recent rulings

Case	County	Motion	Ruling	Indexed	Hearing
M-CV-0097654 VINEYARD GATE APTS. v. DAVIS, MAHAGANY	placer Civil	Motion to Set Aside Judgment	DENIED; Judgment set aside by court on its own motion	Aug 12, 2026	Aug 13, 2026
M-CV-0097654 VINEYARD GATE APTS v. DAVIS, MAHAGANY	placer Civil	Motion to Set Aside Judgment	CONTINUED	Aug 14, 2026	Jul 30, 2026
S-CV-0053651 Karla Langner v. Nolivo Girolamo	placer Civil	Motion to Compel	CONTINUED	Jul 15, 2026	Jun 26, 2026
S-CV-0050523 Ragini Patel v. Manjit Kaur	placer Civil	Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One; Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Special Interrogatories, Set One	GRANTED	Jul 15, 2026	Jun 26, 2026
S-CV-0052424 Marijati Saulus v. American Honda Motor Co.	placer Civil	Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff Marijati Saulus to Provide Further Responses to Request For Production, Set One; Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff Faustino Urrutia to Provide Further Responses to Request For Production, Set One; Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff Marijati Saulus to Provide Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One; Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff Faustino Urrutia to Provide Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One	CONTINUED	Jul 15, 2026	Jun 26, 2026
S-CV-0056419 Pamela Rogers v. TCG Rocklin Campus, LLC	placer Civil	Motion to Compel Arbitration	CONTINUED	Jul 15, 2026	Jun 26, 2026
S-CV-0050494 Nicole Beaubien v. Cinemark	placer Civil	Defendant’s Motion to Compel Independent Medical Examination	Appearance required	Jul 8, 2026	Jun 12, 2026
S-CV-0053572 Acquaye, Deandre v. Singh, Palwinder	placer Civil	Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Southlake Specialty Insurance Company to Comply With Subpoena	GRANTED	Jul 8, 2026	Jun 12, 2026
S-CV-0049514 Liu, Ping v. The Original Mowbrays Tree Service	placer Civil	Motion to Compel Production of Documents by Plaintiff’s Expert Witness	Appearance required	Jul 8, 2026	Jun 12, 2026
S-CV-0052886 Foxx v. Roseville Joint Union High School District	placer Civil	Defendant’s Motion to Compel Independent Neuropsychological Examination	DENIED	Jul 8, 2026	Jun 12, 2026
S-CV-0055117 Harris v. Safeway, Inc.	placer Civil	Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses	Dropped from calendar	Jul 8, 2026	Jun 12, 2026
S-PR-0013051 In Re Estate of Shackelford	placer Civil	Motion to Compel Production Pursuant to Subpoena	CONTINUED	Jul 8, 2026	Jun 12, 2026
S-CV-0054714 Shelly Lee-Sasore v. Westfield, LLC	placer Civil	Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One) and to Form Interrogatories (Set No. One); Motion to Compel (Production of Documents (Set One)); Motion to Deem Matters Admitted in Plaintiffs’ Requests For Admission (Set One)	GRANTED	Jun 8, 2026	May 15, 2026
S-CV-0055740 Brian LeGrand v. Karen LeGrand	placer Civil	Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Karen Legrand to Provide Further Discovery	Appearance required	Jun 8, 2026	May 15, 2026
S-CV-0055800 M.A. v. Foresthill USD	placer Civil	Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatory	GRANTED	Jun 8, 2026	May 15, 2026
S-CV-0053572 Acquaye, Deandre v. Singh, Palwinder	placer Civil	Plaintiff’s Motion For Sanctions; Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena; Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Payment of Costs and For Sanctions	Motion for sanctions granted ($3,500). Motion to compel compliance dropped. Motion to compel payment of costs and for sanctions set for hearing.	May 20, 2026	May 8, 2026
S-CV-0055804 Gannon, Raime v. Childtime Learning Centers	placer Civil	Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories	DENIED	May 20, 2026	May 8, 2026
S-CV-0055104 Bondarenko, Ievgen v. Nelson, Forest	placer Civil	Plaintiff’s Motin to Quash or Modify Subpoenas	Appearance required	May 20, 2026	May 8, 2026
S- CV-0049514 Liu, Ping v. The Original Mowbrays Tree Service	placer Civil	Motion to Compel Production of Documents by Plaintiff’s Expert Witness, Randall C. Epperson, PhD.	GRANTED	May 20, 2026	May 1, 2026
S- CV-0050494 Beaubien, Nicole v. Cinemark	placer Civil	Motion to Compel IME	CONTINUED	May 20, 2026	May 1, 2026
M- CV-0090108 Discover Bank v. Paul Albrecht	placer Civil	Plaintiff’s Motion to Deem Requests For Admissions Admitted	GRANTED	May 20, 2026	May 1, 2026
M- CV-0085411 Riedel, Bruce v. Courtesy Towing	placer Civil	Defendant’s Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena, For Stay of Deposition and Protective Order	GRANTED	May 20, 2026	May 1, 2026
S- CV-0053853 Francisco Benavidez v. John Mourier Construction	placer Civil	Defendant’s Motion to Compel Deposition	CONTINUED	May 20, 2026	May 1, 2026
S- CV-0049572 Roe, Jane v. Doe 1	placer Civil	Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery	No motion filed	May 20, 2026	May 1, 2026
S- CV-0053651 Langner, Karla v. Nolivo, Girolamo	placer Civil	Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories; Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents; Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Admission; Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories	Mixed	May 20, 2026	May 1, 2026

Frequently asked questions

What is Judge Albert A. Erkel's grant rate in California Superior Court?+

Based on 25 tentative rulings indexed by DecisionDepot, Judge Albert A. Erkel has a 28% grant rate (12% denial rate, 28% continued). Counties active: PLACER.

What kinds of motions does Judge Albert A. Erkel hear most often?+

The most common motion type in Judge Albert A. Erkel's indexed rulings is Motion to Compel Discovery. The full motion-type breakdown appears on this page — each motion type shows grant, denial, and continuance counts so practitioners can prepare accordingly.