DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S- CV-0049514·placer·Civil·Civil
Hearing 4 months agoGRANTED

Liu, Ping v. The Original Mowbrays Tree Service

Motion to Compel Production of Documents by Plaintiff’s Expert Witness, Randall C. Epperson, PhD.

Hearing date
May 1, 2026
Department
33
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPing Liu
DefendantThe Original Mowbrays Tree Service

Ruling

3. S-CV-0049514 Liu, Ping v. The Original Mowbrays Tree Service

Motion to Compel Production of Documents by Plaintiff’s Expert Witness, Randall C. Epperson, PhD.

Defendant’s motion is granted, subject to the parties entering into a protective order protecting the confidentiality of the documents.

4. S-CV-0049572 Roe, Jane v. Doe 1

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery

Date reserved, but no motion filed.

5. S-CV-0050494 Beaubien, Nicole v. Cinemark

Motion to Compel IME

Appearance of the parties is required on May 1, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. in Department 33. Counsel are directed to be prepared to discuss dates that are available for the IME.

6. S-CV-0053651 Langner, Karla v. Nolivo, Girolamo

Defendant Allison James of California, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, Propounded by Defendant to Plaintiff Karla Langner

Interrogatory No. 1 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 3 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 4 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 6 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 7 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 9 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 10 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 12 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 13 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Interrogatory No. 15 – All objections are overruled. Plaintiff is to respond to this interrogatory.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share