DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0055804·placer·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

Gannon, Raime v. Childtime Learning Centers

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories

Hearing date
May 8, 2026
Department
33
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$457.50

Parties

PlaintiffRaime Gannon
DefendantChildtime Learning Centers

Ruling

3. S-CV-0055804 Gannon, Raime v. Childtime Learning Centers

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories

Placer County Local Rule 20.2.1, requires that “[p]rior to filing any motion ... the moving party must make a reasonable and good faith attempt to resolve the matter....”

CCP § 2030.300(b)(1) requires that a motion to compel further responses “shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040” [emphasis added]. CCP § 2016.040 states “[a] meet and confer declaration in support of a motion shall state facts showing a reasonable and good faith attempt either in person, by telephone, or by videoconference, to informally resolve each issue presented by the motion” [emphasis added].

CCP § 2023.020 states “[n]otwithstanding the outcome of the particular discovery motion, the court shall impose a monetary sanction ordering that any party or attorney who fails to confer as required pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fee, incurred by anyone as a result of that conduct.”

Plaintiff’s motion acknowledges that no meet and confer discussion was even attempted. As a result, plaintiff’s motion is denied. In addition, as a result of plaintiff’s failure to meet and confer prior to filing this motion, plaintiff shall pay sanctions to defendant in the amount of $457.50.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share