DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0055117·placer·Civil·Civil
Hearing 2 months agoDropped from calendar

Harris v. Safeway, Inc.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses

Hearing date
Jun 12, 2026
Department
33
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Ruling

As a result of plaintiff’s stipulation, defendant’s motion is denied. The defendant has failed to show that exceptional circumstances exist to justify a neuropsychological examination.

4. S-CV-0053572 Acquaye, Deandre v. Singh, Palwinder

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Southlake Specialty Insurance Company to Comply With Subpoena

No objection was made to the subject subpoena. No motion was made to quash the subpoena or to seek a protective order. Plaintiff’s motion is granted. The subject documents shall be produced by July 13, 2026. Sanctions in the amount of $1,050 shall be paid by Southlake Specialty Insurance Company by July 13, 2026.

5. S-CV-0055117 Harris v. Safeway, Inc.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses

Date reserved, but no motion filed. The hearing is dropped from calendar.

6. S-PR-0013051 In Re Estate of Shackelford

Motion to Compel Production Pursuant to Subpoena

This motion has been continued to September 14, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 2. Pending the hearing, the Placer County Sheriff’s Office is ordered to preserve the evidence that is requested in the subpoena which is the subject of the motion.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share