Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatory
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Motion to Deem Matters Admitted in Plaintiffs’ Requests For Admission (Set One)
Plaintiffs’ motion to deem the truth of matters specified in Requests For Admission (Set One) propounded on defendant PCJV USA, LLC dba Potato Corner is granted.
Plaintiff’s request for monetary sanctions against defendant PCJV USA, LLC dba Potato Corner is granted in the amount of $520.00. Such sanctions shall be paid no later than June 15, 2026. Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions against defendant’s counsel is denied.
2. S-CV-0055740 Brian LeGrand v. Karen LeGrand
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Karen Legrand to Provide Further Discovery
Appearance of the parties is required on May 15, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. in Department 33.
3. S-CV-0055800 M.A. v. Foresthill USD
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatory
Plaintiff seeks an order requiring defendant Foresthill USD to fully respond to Special Interrogatory No. 1 (to identify the parent(s) or guardian(s) of P.C. during the 2024 – 2025 school year). Defendant did not file any opposition to the motion. The motion is granted.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”