DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24674936·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED, in part.

RELATED MANAGEMENT CO., LP VS. TOALUA MCMULLIN ET AL

Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Judgment; Motion to Recall Writ of Execution

Hearing date
Jun 24, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRELATED MANAGEMENT CO., LP
DefendantTOALUA MCMULLIN

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24674936 - June 24, 2025 Hearing date: June 24, 2025 Case number: CUD24674936 Case title: RELATED MANAGEMENT CO., LP VS. TOALUA MCMULLIN ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24674936 | Case Title: | | RELATED MANAGEMENT CO., LP VS. TOALUA MCMULLIN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for June 24, 2025, line 6.

Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Judgment and Recall Writ of Execution is GRANTED, in part. The judgment entered on May 12, 2025 is vacated. Request to recall writ of execution is DENIED because no writ has been issued. Late-filed opposition is stricken as it would have been untimely even if it had been successfully filed on June 9, 2025. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share