| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion To Set Aside Default, Vacate Default Judgment And Recall The Writ Of Possession, Or, In The Alternative, Quash Service Of Summons
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25677984 - July 1, 2025 Hearing date: July 1, 2025 Case number: CUD25677984 Case title: AVA NINTH, L.P. VS. LUIS SANTANA-LOZADA ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25677984 | Case Title: | | AVA NINTH, L.P. VS. LUIS SANTANA-LOZADA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-01 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Set Aside Default, Vacate Default Judgment And Recall The Writ Of Possession, Or, In The Alternative, Quash Service Of Summons | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 1, 2025 line 9.
DEFENDANTS LUIS SANTANA-LOZADA, ERIC LANDRUM, AND NINA VAN ESS' MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT, VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND RECALL THE WRIT OF POSSESSION, OR QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS is GRANTED in part, based on the mandatory provision of CCP 473(b) only. Plaintiff's untimely opposition is stricken. The defaults of defendants Eric Landrum, Luis Santana-Lozada, Nina Van Ess are set aside. The default judgment entered on May 20, 2025 is vacated. The writ issued on June 5, 2025 is recalled. Defendants' alternative request to quash service of summons is DENIED. Defendants shall file and serve the proposed response within five days. =(501/SKF)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”