DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681951·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoMotion to vacate default GRANTED; Motion to Quash DENIED

WING KIN KWAN VS. WILLIAM WALKER ET AL

Motion To Quash Service Of Summons; Alternative Request To Vacate Any Default Or Default Judgment As Void

Hearing date
Jul 24, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWING KIN KWAN
DefendantWILLIAM WALKER

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 24, 2026. Line 16.1. DEFENDANT WILLIAM WALKER Motion To Quash Service Of Summons; Alternative Request To Vacate Any Default Or Default Judgment As Void is GRANTED as follows.

The Court considers this application as Defendant's motion to vacate default under CCP 473(b). Had default been entered on July 8, 2026, the Court would grant a CCP 473(b) motions based on the evidence provided in Defendant's declarations on file. At this time the Court does not make any determination re: entry of default nunc pro tunc as of July 8, 2026. To avoid the delay and expense of subsequent motions on this issue, the Court makes this ruling at this time.

The Court considers Defendant's Motion to Quash as the response contemplated by CCP 473(b) and DENIED the Motion to Quash. Defendant has been properly served with the Summons and Complaint by a registered process server and failed to rebut the presumption afforded to registered process servers. Defendant shall file a response within 5 days of notice of order.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share