TIMOTHY WONG ET AL VS. BRYAN ANGELO MCGILL ET AL
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL UNDER CCP 657
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678398 - August 12, 2025 Hearing date: August 12, 2025 Case number: CUD25678398 Case title: TIMOTHY WONG ET AL VS. BRYAN ANGELO MCGILL ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678398 | Case Title: | | TIMOTHY WONG ET AL VS. BRYAN ANGELO MCGILL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-12 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL UNDER CCP 657 (FILED AT INSISTANCE OF LITIGANT) | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 12, 2025, line 8.
Defendants' Motion for New Trial Under CCP 657 is DENIED. Defendants have not shown that this relief is warranted for any of the reasons listed in CCP 657 which have materially affected their substantial rights. =(501/SKF)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”