| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL (AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT UNDER CCP 657, 659, 663)
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC18569923 - January 9, 2026 Hearing date: January 9, 2026 Case number: CGC18569923 Case title: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL VS. SANTOS & URRUTIA ASSOCIATES, INC. Case Number: | | CGC18569923 | Case Title: | | CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL VS. SANTOS & URRUTIA ASSOCIATES, INC. | Court Date: | | 2026-01-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL (AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT UNDER CCP 657, 659, 663) MOVING PARTY: KEVIN O'CONNOR | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 9, 2026.
Line 1.1. MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL (AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT UNDER CCP 657, 659, 663) MOVING PARTY: KEVIN O'CONNOR is DENIED. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”