DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23609947·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

SILVIA BRISTOL ET AL VS. MCGUIRE FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication

Hearing date
Jul 14, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffSilvia Bristol
DefendantMcGuire Family Properties LLC
DefendantPontar Real Estate Management Corporation

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, July 14, 2026, line 1.

DEFENDANT MCGUIRE FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC, PONTAR REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION's MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication. DENIED.

Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendants do not address all claims asserted against them in the Complaint.

Motion for Summary Adjudication is DENIED. Motion for Summary Adjudication appears to be based on one issue combining multiple claims (claims for negligence, premises liability, breach of contract, nuisance, and negligent infliction of emotional distress). Triable issues of fact exist (See opposition separate statement), precluding motion for summary adjudication.

= (501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share