HAIQING QUI VS. SAMUEL KAO ET AL
Application For A Warrant For Seizing The Defendant'S Bank Account And Property Seizing Order
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC26637393 - August 27, 2026 Hearing date: August 27, 2026 Case number: CGC26637393 Case title: HAIQING QUI VS. SAMUEL KAO ET AL Case Number: | | CGC26637393 | Case Title: | | HAIQING QUI VS. SAMUEL KAO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-27 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Application For A Warrant For Seizing The Defendant'S Bank Account And Property Seizing Order | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for August 27, 2026, line 11.
PLAINTIFF HAIQING QUI'S Application For A Warrant For Seizing The Defendant's Bank Account And Property Seizing Order. The unopposed application for a warrant to seize the defendant's bank account and property is denied. Plaintiff does not show proof that the moving papers were served on the defendant. In addition, Plaintiff does not provide a statutory or evidentiary basis for the requested order.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. If no party contests the tentative ruling, it will be adopted verbatim in a minute order.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”