LI CHANG KUANG VS. KENNY WONG ET AL

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC23608569 - November 12, 2025 Hearing date: November 12, 2025 Case number: CGC23608569 Case title: LI CHANG KUANG VS. KENNY WONG ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23608569 | Case Title: | | LI CHANG KUANG VS. KENNY WONG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-12 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for November 12, 2025, line 4. DEFENDANT KENNY WONG'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS.

Defendant Kenny Wong's motion to quash service of summons is DENIED. "When a defendant challenges the court's personal jurisdiction on the ground of improper service of process, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove the existence of jurisdiction by proving, inter alia, the facts requisite to an effective service." (Summers v. McClanahan (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 403, 413 [internal quotation marks, citation, and footnote omitted].)

Plaintiffs Li Chang Kuang and Tommy Chan presented adequate evidence in their counsel's declaration to carry their burden that effective service was made. Defendant Wong's argument that Defendant Park Avenue Banning, Inc. was not properly served is moot. Only Defendant Kenny Wong is opposing this motion; there is no indication that Defendant Park Avenue Banning, Inc.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.