DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682089·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE ET AL

Notice Of Renewed Motion And Motion For Order Deeming Matters Admitted (Set Two) And To Compel Initial Responses To Special Interrogatories (Set Two); Request For Terminating, Evidentiary And Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKEVIN VED
DefendantTRI VAN LE

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 23, 2026. Line 12. PLAINTIFF KEVIN VED Notice Of Renewed Motion And Motion For Order Deeming Matters Admitted (Set Two) And To Compel Initial Responses To Special Interrogatories (Set Two); Request For Terminating, Evidentiary And Monetary Sanctions is DENIED.

Plaintiff has not provided any evidence of the date the discovery was purportedly served, nor any copies of the discovery requests at issue. Additionally, as Plaintiff admits he has received responses to the discovery, the severe remedies of deemed admissions and terminating and evidentiary sanctions are not appropriate.

Plaintiff cites no authority for the proposition that the copy of the proof of service that is enclosed with the served documents, i.e. before the service has been completed, must be signed, or that failure to include a signed proof of service with the served documents invalidates the service that has admittedly occurred.

Finally, the Court notes that while a declaration in opposition to this motion was filed on July 22,2026, proof of service reflects that the opposition was served on the pro per Plaintiff by electronic means only, and there does not appear to be any express consent to electronic service on file. Therefore, the opposition was not considered. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share