Notice Of Motion And Omnibus Motion For: (1) Order Deeming Matter Admitted; (2) Order Compelling Initial Responses To Special Interrogatories And Demand For Production; And (3) Monetary Sanctions
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC26636610 - August 11, 2026 Hearing date: August 11, 2026 Case number: CGC26636610 Case title: KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE Case Number: | | CGC26636610 | Case Title: | | KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE | Court Date: | | 2026-08-11 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Omnibus Motion For: (1) Order Deeming Matter Admitted; (2) Order Compelling Initial Responses To Special Interrogatories And Demand For Production; And)3) Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 11, 2026. Line 5.
Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion for: (1) Order Deeming Matter Admitted; (2) Order Compelling Initial Responses to Special Interrogatories and Demand for Production; and (3) Monetary Sanctions is continued to August 31, 2026.
Discovery motions in general civil actions are heard in department 302 for even-numbered cases.=(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”