DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682089·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing todayCONTINUED

KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE ET AL

Notice Of Renewed Motion And Renewed Motion To Compel Further Responses To: 1) Request For Production Of Documents (Set One) Pursuant To Ccp 2031.310; (2) Special Interrogatories (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2030.300; (3) Requests For Admission (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2033.290; Expedited Noitce Under Ccp 1170.8; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Request For Mandatory Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 20, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKEVIN VED
DefendantTRI VAN LE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682089 - August 18, 2026 Hearing date: August 18, 2026 Case number: CUD26682089 Case title: KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682089 | Case Title: | | KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Renewed Motion And Renewed Motion To Compel Further Responses To: 1) Request For Production Of Documents (Set One) Pursuant To Ccp 2031.310; (2) Special Interrogatories (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2030.300; (3) Requests For Admission (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2033.290; Expedited Noitce Under Ccp 1170.8; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Request For Mandatory Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 18, 2026. Line 9.

PLAINTIFF KEVIN VED Notice Of Renewed Motion And Renewed Motion To Compel Further Responses To: 1) Request For Production Of Documents (Set One) Pursuant To Ccp 2031.310; (2) Special Interrogatories (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2030.300; (3) Requests For Admission (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2033.290; Expedited Noitce Under Ccp 1170.8; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Request For Mandatory Monetary Sanctions is continued to August 20, 2026 on the Court's own motion.=(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share