DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682089·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing in about 6 hours

KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE ET AL

Notice Of Renewed Motion And Renewed Motion To Compel Further Responses To: 1) Request For Production Of Documents (Set One) Pursuant To Ccp 2031.310; (2) Special Interrogatories (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2030.300; (3) Requests For Admission (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2033.290; Expedited Noitce Under Ccp 1170.8; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Request For Mandatory Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKEVIN VED
DefendantTRI VAN LE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682089 - August 20, 2026 Hearing date: August 20, 2026 Case number: CUD26682089 Case title: KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682089 | Case Title: | | KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Renewed Motion And Renewed Motion To Compel Further Responses To: 1) Request For Production Of Documents (Set One) Pursuant To Ccp 2031.310; (2) Special Interrogatories (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2030.300; (3) Requests For Admission (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2033.290; Expedited Noitce Under Ccp 1170.8; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Request For Mandatory Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 20, 2026.

Line 13. PLAINTIFF KEVIN VED Notice Of Renewed Motion And Renewed Motion To Compel Further Responses To: 1) Request For Production Of Documents (Set One) Pursuant To Ccp 2031.310; (2) Special Interrogatories (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2030.300; (3) Requests For Admission (Set Two) Pursuant To Ccp 2033.290; Expedited Noitce Under Ccp 1170.8; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Request For Mandatory Monetary Sanctions | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share