DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR0001787·marin·Probate·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoMatter continued to June 25, 2026.

IN THE MATTER OF OSCAR CARLSON

Petition for Letters of Administration

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 25, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerLinnea Carlson

Ruling

PR0001787 IN THE MATTER OF OSCAR CARLSON

Petition for Letters of Administration, filed by Linnea Carlson on 4/29/26.

Ruling. This matter is continued to June 25, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Petitioner is ordered to address the following: 1. A Supplement to Petition, signed and verified by Petitioner, must be filed to provide the following information required by the Petition for Letters of Administration: a. Was Decedent survived by a registered domestic partner? (Item 5a(3)-(4).) If so, please provide their names, ages, relationships to Decedent, and address. b. Was Decedent survived by any issue of a predeceased child? (Item 5a(7)-(8).) If so, please provide their names, ages, relationships to Decedent, and address. c. What is Oscar Carlson’s relationship to the Decedent? (Item 8.)

2. The Petition does not identify the proposed administrator in Item 2b. The Attachment requests that the Court appoint the Public Administrator. In order for the Court to be able to do this, the following items must be filed: a. Written consent to serve as Administrator signed by the Public Administrator. b. Written consent to the appointment of the Administrator signed by Oscar Carlson.

3. A proposed Order must be submitted to the Court on the mandatory form “Order for Probate.” (Judicial Council Forms, form DE-140.)

4. All documents must be filed or submitted at least five court days prior to hearing. (Super. Ct. Marin County, Local Rules, rule 6.2(b), Filing, Hearing, and Continuance Procedures.)

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 7 | 13

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share