DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR0001791·marin·Probate·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoMatter continued to June 25, 2026.

IN THE MATTER OF DIANA LOY KAERCHER

Petition for Letters of Administration

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 25, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerJoan M. Hendricks

Ruling

PR0001791 IN THE MATTER OF DIANA LOY KAERCHER

Petition for Letters of Administration, filed by Joan M. Hendricks on 4/17/26.

Ruling. This matter is continued to June 25, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Petitioner is ordered to: 1. File a Supplement to Petition that provides the following information required by the Petition for Letters of Administration: a. Was Decedent survived by any issue of a predeceased child? (Petition, Item 5a(7)-(8).) If so, please provide their names, ages, relationships to Decedent, and address. b. Additional information with regard to the relationships of Decedent’s nieces and nephews. Ex: John Doe, son of Decedent’s predeceased sister, Jane Doe. c. For each of Decedent’s post-deceased siblings, provide the name of the personal representative of that relative’s estate, or if none, the names of that relative’s heirs and/or beneficiaries of any will as of that relative’s date of death. d. Name, relationship, age, and address of each party named in response to the above. (Pet., Item 8.)

2. File Proof of Service showing that all interested parties named in response to Issue 1 received at least fifteen days’ notice of the Petition on the mandatory form “Notice of Petition to Administer Estate.” (Judicial Council Forms, form DE-121; Prob. Code, § 8110.)

3. All documents must be filed at least five court days prior to hearing. (Super. Ct. Marin County, Local Rules, rule 6.2(b), Filing, Hearing, and Continuance Procedures.)

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 8 | 13

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share