DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678028·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. JOHN ZIMMER

Plaintiff's Notice of Motion to Compel Defendant John Zimmer's responses to Form Interrogatories - General, Set One, Form Interrogatories - Unlawful Detainer, Set One, and Request for Production of Documents, Set One; Request for Sanctions in the amount of $585.00

Hearing date
Jun 16, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 23, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$585.00

Parties

PlaintiffTHE JOHN STEWART COMPANY
DefendantJOHN ZIMMER

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 16, 2025 line 11. PLAINTIFF THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT JOHN ZIMMER'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FORM INTERROGATORIES - GENERAL, SET ONE, PLAINTIFF'S FORM INTERROGATORIES - UNLAWFUL DETAINER, SET ONE, PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT JOHN ZIMMER IN THE AMOUNT OF $585.00 is CONTINUED to June 23, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., for the moving party to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the moving papers no later than June 17, 2025, with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. (Opposition and reply received.)=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share