DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682503·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. JUNZHEN SUN ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Compel Defendant Bohdan Pochynok'S Responses To Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories-General, Set One, Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories-Unlawful Detainer, Set One, Plaintiff'S Request For Production Of Documents, Set One, To Deem Facts Admitted And Request For Sanctions Against Defendant Bohdan Pochynok In The Amount Of $585.00

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 24, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$585.00

Parties

PlaintiffTHE JOHN STEWART COMPANY
DefendantJUNZHEN SUN
DefendantBohdan Pochynok

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682503 - July 22, 2026 Hearing date: July 22, 2026 Case number: CUD26682503 Case title: THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. JUNZHEN SUN ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682503 | Case Title: | | THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. JUNZHEN SUN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-22 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Compel Defendant Bohdan Pochynok'S Responses To Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories-General, Set One, Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories-Unlawful Detainer, Set One, Plaintiff'S Request For Production Of Documents, Set One, To Deem Facts Admitted And Request For Sanctions Against Defendant Bohdan Pochynok In The Amount Of $585.00 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 22, 2026. Line 11.

PLAINTIFF Motion To Compel Defendant Bohdan Pochynok'S Responses To Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories-General, Set One, Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories-Unlawful Detainer, Set One, Plaintiff'S Request For Production Of Documents, Set One, To Deem Facts Admitted And Request For Sanctions Against Defendant Bohdan Pochynok In The Amount Of $585.00 is CONTINUED to July 24, 2026 on the Court's own motion.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share