DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF25519025·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

IN RE: ANDREW TRUITT ET AL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY

Hearing date
Jun 26, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerAndrew Truitt

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CPF25519025 - June 26, 2025 Hearing date: June 26, 2025 Case number: CPF25519025 Case title: IN RE: ANDREW TRUITT ET AL Case Number: | | CPF25519025 | Case Title: | | IN RE: ANDREW TRUITT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-26 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for June 26, 2025, line 1. OSC re: Sale of Real Property is GRANTED. No opposition filed.

Moving party to submit a proposed order to the Court. =(501/SKF) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share