DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC18571355·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 10 months agoCONTINUED

JENNIFER SARKANY ET AL VS. CHRISTIE WEST ET AL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SALE OF DWELLING

Hearing date
Oct 13, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Nov 13, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJENNIFER SARKANY
DefendantCHRISTIE WEST

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC18571355 - October 13, 2025 Hearing date: October 13, 2025 Case number: CGC18571355 Case title: JENNIFER SARKANY ET AL VS. CHRISTIE WEST ET AL Case Number: | | CGC18571355 | Case Title: | | JENNIFER SARKANY ET AL VS. CHRISTIE WEST ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SALE OF DWELLING | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for October 13, 2025, line 1. OSC re: Sale of Dwelling is continued for good cause to November 13, 2025 for bankruptcy status. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share