DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26636728·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

SUSAN JOHNSON ET AL VS. JULIA NOEMI ZULETA ET AL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Hearing date
Jul 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSUSAN JOHNSON
DefendantJULIA NOEMI ZULETA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC26636728 - July 27, 2026 Hearing date: July 27, 2026 Case number: CGC26636728 Case title: SUSAN JOHNSON ET AL VS. JULIA NOEMI ZULETA ET AL Case Number: | | CGC26636728 | Case Title: | | SUSAN JOHNSON ET AL VS. JULIA NOEMI ZULETA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 27, 2026. Line 6.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION is GRANTED as requested. Defendant shall not engage in acts described in sections (a)-(e) of the June 25, 2026 Order to Show Cause. Except that litigation over the alleged disputed area shall not be considered interference within the meaning of section (e) of the Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff to prepare an order. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share