DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26632582·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 1 day agoGRANTED

BENJAMIN C GRAVES VS. WILLIAM MCDONAGH

Notice Of Motion For Application For Order Of Sale Of Real Property And Order To Show Cause As To Reasons The Order For Sale Should Not Be Issued

Hearing date
Aug 17, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBENJAMIN C GRAVES
DefendantWILLIAM MCDONAGH

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC26632582 - August 17, 2026 Hearing date: August 17, 2026 Case number: CGC26632582 Case title: BENJAMIN C GRAVES VS. WILLIAM MCDONAGH Case Number: | | CGC26632582 | Case Title: | | BENJAMIN C GRAVES VS. WILLIAM MCDONAGH | Court Date: | | 2026-08-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion For Application For Order Of Sale Of Real Property And Order To Show Cause As To Reasons The Order For Sale Should Not Be Issued | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 17, 2026.

Line 6. Plaintiff's Application for Sale of Dwelling is GRANTED for the reasons outlined in the moving papers and reply. =(501/SKF) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share