| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Return Of Seized Property & For Monetary Sanction
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24676318 - September 17, 2025 Hearing date: September 17, 2025 Case number: CUD24676318 Case title: TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. KAHTOA YEUNG ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24676318 | Case Title: | | TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. KAHTOA YEUNG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Return Of Seized Property & For Monetary Sanction | Rulings: | | On the Real Property/Housing Court motion calendar for September 17, 2025, line 5.
Defendant's Motion for Return of Seized Property & For Monetary Sanction is DENIED. The Court notes that the proof of service provided with the motion is not code-compliant. However, Plaintiff filed an opposition on the merits, therefore the motion is addressed on the merits and is denied. Defendant failed to cite any authority for the proposition that the relief sought is available in this action. Defendant further admits that defendant has been informed that his property had been disposed of via Recology pickup. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”