DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681779·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC VS. EMANUEL COPES ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT , Or Adjudication Regarding Duty To Deliver Possession

Hearing date
Jul 17, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffTENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC
DefendantEMANUEL COPES

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681779 - July 17, 2026 Hearing date: July 17, 2026 Case number: CUD26681779 Case title: TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC VS. EMANUEL COPES ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681779 | Case Title: | | TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC VS. EMANUEL COPES ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Or Adjudication Regarding Duty To Deliver Possession | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 17, 2026. Line 11.

PLAINTIFF TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Or Adjudication Regarding Duty To Deliver Possession is DENIED. Plaintiff has failed to meet its initial burden of proving each element of its cause of action for unlawful detainer. Specifically, the 3-Day Notice of Lease Termination and Notice to Quit, which does not state either the date the three-day period commences or when it ends, does not provide sufficient information such that an ordinary tenant would have reasonably understood the deadline. (See Eshagian v. Cepeda (2025) 112 Cal.App.5th 433, 459.)

Moreover, the Declaration of Howard Olsen is stricken, and was not considered, as there is no proof of service of this document and the Notice of Motion omits it from the list of supporting papers.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share