DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680697·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 6 months agoGRANTED

TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. ROBERT DYSON ET AL

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND

Hearing date
Feb 17, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
DefendantROBERT DYSON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680697 - February 17, 2026 Hearing date: February 17, 2026 Case number: CUD25680697 Case title: TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. ROBERT DYSON ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680697 | Case Title: | | TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. ROBERT DYSON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 18, 2026. Line 7.

DEFENDANT ROBERT DYSON MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND is GRANTED. No opposition filed. The default of Defendant Robert Dyson is set aside. The default judgment entered on January 8, 2026 is vacated. The writ issued on January 13, 2026 is recalled. Defendant Robert Dyson shall file and serve the proposed answer by 4:00 p.m. on February 17, 2026. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share