DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24676318·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoOFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005(b).

TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. KAHTOA YEUNG ET AL

Notice Of Motion For Return Of Seized Property And For Monetory Sanctions (Filed At The Insistence Of Litigant)

Hearing date
Jul 11, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
DefendantKAHTOA YEUNG ET AL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24676318 - July 11, 2025 Hearing date: July 11, 2025 Case number: CUD24676318 Case title: TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. KAHTOA YEUNG ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24676318 | Case Title: | | TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. KAHTOA YEUNG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-11 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion For Return Of Seized Property And For Monetory Sanctions (Filed At The Insistence Of Litigant) | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 11, 2025, line 5.

Defendant's Motion for Return of Seized Property and for Monetary Sanctions is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005(b). =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share