DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD23672863·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoDENIED as to summary judgment; GRANTED in part as to summary adjudication.

EDDIE YUEN ET AL VS. CYNTHIA LEE ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / Adjudication

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffEDDIE YUEN
DefendantCYNTHIA LEE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD23672863 - August 14, 2025 Hearing date: August 14, 2025 Case number: CUD23672863 Case title: EDDIE YUEN ET AL VS. CYNTHIA LEE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD23672863 | Case Title: | | EDDIE YUEN ET AL VS. CYNTHIA LEE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / Adjudication | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 14, 2025, line 6.

Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment / Adjudication is DENIED as to summary judgment. Triable issues exist, including regarding the lawful rent amount for the premises.

Summary adjudication is GRANTED in part, as to the following issues only: Defendant's Third Affirmative Defense regarding breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment; Defendant's Fourth Affirmative Defense regarding CC 1940.2; and Defendant's Sixth Affirmative Defense regarding calling emergency services.

This action is based on nonpayment of rent, and there is no dispute that defendant has not moved out of the premises. Therefore, defendant cannot maintain the third or fourth affirmative defenses as a matter of law. Additionally, there is no reference to a person summoning law enforcement in the Notice to Pay Rent or Quit, so this action is not based on defendant calling the police or emergency services and defendant cannot maintain the sixth affirmative defense.

However nothing in this ruling shall be construed to prevent defendant from raising these arguments to refute one of plaintiffs' elements or in support of another affirmative defense. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share