Motion for Summary Adjudication Against Plaintiff Hiu Tung Yip
Browse all Motion for Summary Adjudication rulings statewide →
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24611418 - July 29, 2026 Hearing date: July 29, 2026 Case number: CGC24611418 Case title: HIU TUNG YIP VS. 655 POWELL I5, LP ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24611418 | Case Title: | | HIU TUNG YIP VS. 655 POWELL I5, LP ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Against Plaintiff Hiu Tung Yip | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 29, 2026. Line 2.1.
Defendant 655 Powells' Motion for Summary Adjudication is DENIED. Pursuant to CCP 437c(c), Defendants failed to show that there are no issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. A reasonable jury could find that Evans' attack upon Plaintiff was foreseeable and Defendants owed Plaintiff a duty to protect her from the violent attack perpetrated by Evans.=(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”