DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC19579992·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoOFF CALENDAR. Notice of Stay of Proceedings on file.

LINDA CATRON VS. COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB ET AL

Plaintiff'S Notice And Motion To Reconsider Order 3-27-24 Of Plaintiff'S Notice And Motion To Reconsider Defendant'S Bank Of America Na Motion To Dismiss 11/15/2023 And Court Error Defendant Not Party To Complaint

Hearing date
Aug 8, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Reconsideration rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLINDA CATRON
DefendantCOUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB
DefendantBANK OF AMERICA NA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC19579992 - August 8, 2025 Hearing date: August 8, 2025 Case number: CGC19579992 Case title: LINDA CATRON VS. COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB ET AL Case Number: | | CGC19579992 | Case Title: | | LINDA CATRON VS. COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-08 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Plaintiff'S Notice And Motion To Reconsider Order 3-27-24 Of Plaintiff'S Notice And Motion To Reconsider Defendant'S Bank Of America Na Motion To Dismiss 11/15/2023 And Court Error Defendant Not Party To Complaint |

Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 8, 2025, line 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider is OFF CALENDAR. Notice of Stay of Proceedings on file. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share