DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25677683·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoOFF CALENDAR. Dismissal on file.

NAIM NAZZAL VS. AMANDA SILK ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Reconsideration Of Order Denying Defendant'S Motion To Quash Service Of Summons

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Reconsideration rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffNAIM NAZZAL
DefendantAMANDA SILK

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 2, 2025 line 4. DEFENDANT AMANDA SILK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DBA SILK & LACE OCCASIONS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS is OFF CALENDAR. Dismissal on file. =(501/HEK) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share