DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC19573861·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 9 months agoOFF CALENDAR. No proof of service on file.

LINDA S CATRON VS. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC. ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Extend Time 583.60(B); Cal Civ Proc 583.340

Hearing date
Dec 5, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLINDA S CATRON
DefendantNATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC19573861 - December 5, 2025 Hearing date: December 5, 2025 Case number: CGC19573861 Case title: LINDA S CATRON VS. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC19573861 | Case Title: | | LINDA S CATRON VS. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-05 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Extend Time 583.60(B); Cal Civ Proc 583.340 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 5, 2025.

Line 1. PLAINTIFF LINDA CATRON AN INDIVIDUAL Notice Of Motion And Motion To Extend Time 583.60(B); Cal Civ Proc 583.340; is OFF CALENDAR. No proof of service on file. =(501/AAT) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share