DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC19573861·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 5 months agoOFF CALENDAR

LINDA S CATRON VS. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC. ET AL

Motion To Vacate Order To Take Matter Off Calendar Excusabl; Court Error; Under Ccc 473; Motion To Exetend Time

Hearing date
Mar 26, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLINDA S CATRON
DefendantNATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC.

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 26, 2026. Line 1. PLAINTIFF LINDA CATRON AN INDIVIDUAL Motion To Vacate Order To Take Matter Off Calendar is OFF CALENDAR. No valid proof of service on file; no remittitur on file (notice of appeal filed on January 13, 2026); no notice on file re: lifting bankruptcy stay (notice of stay filed on September 25, 2025). =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share