| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679224 - October 24, 2025 Hearing date: October 24, 2025 Case number: CUD25679224 Case title: VIKING SERVICES CORPORATION VS. KENDALL S. CARROLL ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679224 | Case Title: | | VIKING SERVICES CORPORATION VS. KENDALL S. CARROLL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for October 24, 2025. Line 5.
PLAINTIFF VIKING SERVICES CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS WEST COAST PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is DENIED. Plaintiff has not met its initial burden of showing that the Three-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit served to Defendant stated the amount that was due. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”