DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC21596771·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 6 months agoDENIED

MHYF HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. CHRIS V. KELLY ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hearing date
Feb 24, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMHYF HOLDINGS, LLC
DefendantCHRIS V. KELLY
DefendantXIE ASSOCIATES, INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC21596771 - February 24, 2026 Hearing date: February 24, 2026 Case number: CGC21596771 Case title: MHYF HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. CHRIS V. KELLY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC21596771 | Case Title: | | MHYF HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. CHRIS V. KELLY ET AL |

Court Date: | | 2026-02-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 24, 2026. Line 2. DEFENDANT XIE ASSOCIATES, INC. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is DENIED. Triable issues of fact exist as to the purported de minimis involvement of the moving party in the Project; whether the moving party qualifies as a principal architect; whether Plaintiffs are third-party beneficiaries. See also Separate Statement facts 15 and 18. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share