MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681507 - June 24, 2026 Hearing date: June 24, 2026 Case number: CUD26681507 Case title: PLAZA GROUP, LLC VS. LESLIE BRIGHAM ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681507 | Case Title: | | PLAZA GROUP, LLC VS. LESLIE BRIGHAM ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 24, 2026. Line 13.
PLAINTIFF PLAZA GROUP, LLC MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is DENIED. Plaintiff has failed to show that there are no triable issues of material fact and that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law pursuant to C.C.P. 437c, as Claimant alleges violations of the warranty of habitability predating service of the Three-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit.
Further, C.C.P. 1174.3 is not applicable to Claimant, as this section pertains to Post-Judgment Claims of Right to Possession, and Claimant filed a Pre-Judgment Claim of Right to Possession. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”