DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24676440·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing todayDENIED without prejudice.

MH PROPERTY INVESTMENT LLC VS. ARDELIA AYANNA KILLINGS ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMH PROPERTY INVESTMENT LLC
DefendantARDELIA AYANNA KILLINGS

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 27, 2026. Line 5.

PLAINTIFF MH PROPERTY INVESTMENT LLC Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation is DENIED without prejudice.

Requested judgment appears to include amounts not contemplated in Paragraph 1 of the Stipulation. No foundation for the statement in the supporting declaration that rent was legally increased and no provision of the Stipulation identified that entitles Plaintiff to request a judgment that includes any increase in rent beyond the daily amount authorized by Paragraph 1. No evidence that Defendant remains in possession.

Plaintiff's counsel is admonished to comply with CRC 3.1110(f)(3), i.e., by including exhibit tabs, in connection with all future courtesy copies provided to the Court. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share