ESSEX FOX PLAZA, LP VS. RACHELLE BLACK ET AL
Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Possession And Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24675895 - July 1, 2025 Hearing date: July 1, 2025 Case number: CUD24675895 Case title: ESSEX FOX PLAZA, LP VS. RACHELLE BLACK ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24675895 | Case Title: | | ESSEX FOX PLAZA, LP VS. RACHELLE BLACK ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-01 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Possession And Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 1, 2025 line 6.
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FOR POSSESSION AND MONETARY DAMAGES PURSUANT TO STIPULATION is DENIED.
Plaintiff's ledger reflects that defendant fully complied with her obligations under the Stipulation as of January 23, 2025. The terms of the Stipulation required plaintiff to dismiss the action with prejudice upon defendant's full compliance. To the extent plaintiff seeks judgment based on payment obligations that arose after January 23, 2025, the Stipulation is unenforceable as to those payments. Plaintiff cannot obtain judgment in this action after plaintiff was required to dismiss this action.
Plaintiff's supplemental filings which were filed less than 5 court days before the hearing date are stricken as untimely. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”