DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24677109·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 11 months agoGRANTED

735 TAYLOR I1, LP VS. JEREMIAH MULLENIX ET AL

Notice Of Motion In Support Of Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation

Hearing date
Sep 19, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff735 TAYLOR I1, LP
DefendantJEREMIAH MULLENIX

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24677109 - September 19, 2025 Hearing date: September 19, 2025 Case number: CUD24677109 Case title: 735 TAYLOR I1, LP VS. JEREMIAH MULLENIX ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24677109 | Case Title: | | 735 TAYLOR I1, LP VS. JEREMIAH MULLENIX ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion In Support Of Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Sept 19, 2025. Line 11.

PLAINTIFF 735 TAYLOR I1, LP Notice Of Motion In Support Of Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation is GRANTED. No opposition filed. Judgment shall enter in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for possession of the premises and forfeiture of the rental agreement. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share