DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23606090·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoOFF CALENDAR. No proper Proof of Service on file.

LYNDA R. FARAC-DOWD ET AL VS. KAREN P. FARAC ET AL

Notice Of Supplemental Motion For Attorney'S Fees

Hearing date
Jul 3, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLYNDA R. FARAC-DOWD
DefendantKAREN P. FARAC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23606090 - July 3, 2025 Hearing date: July 3, 2025 Case number: CGC23606090 Case title: LYNDA R. FARAC-DOWD ET AL VS. KAREN P. FARAC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23606090 | Case Title: | | LYNDA R. FARAC-DOWD ET AL VS. KAREN P. FARAC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Supplemental Motion For Attorney'S Fees | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 3, 2025 line 2. DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES is OFF CALENDAR.

No proper Proof of Service on file. There is no proof of service from Cordova Courier demonstrating that the documents were personally delivered. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share