| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681500 - April 17, 2026 Hearing date: April 17, 2026 Case number: CUD26681500 Case title: THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. AMY MICHELLE DRATZ Case Number: | | CUD26681500 | Case Title: | | THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. AMY MICHELLE DRATZ | Court Date: | | 2026-04-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | On the Real Property/Housing Motion calendar for April 17, 2026, line 15. Plaintiff's Demurrer to Answer to Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave to amend to address all issues raised by the demurrer. Defendant shall have 5 days from notice of entry of order to file an amended answer. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.