THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. JUNZHEN SUN ET AL
DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682503 - July 27, 2026 Hearing date: July 27, 2026 Case number: CUD26682503 Case title: THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. JUNZHEN SUN ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682503 | Case Title: | | THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. JUNZHEN SUN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 27, 2026. Line 14.
PLAINTIFF THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED. Demurrer to the affirmative defenses 3-5 and 7-10 is sustained with leave to amend for Defendant to allege facts in support of each element of each affirmative defense. Demurrer to the 6th affirmative defense is sustained without leave to amend. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”