THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. RANDOLF NIXON
DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681127 - March 12, 2026 Hearing date: March 12, 2026 Case number: CUD26681127 Case title: THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. RANDOLF NIXON Case Number: | | CUD26681127 | Case Title: | | THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. RANDOLF NIXON | Court Date: | | 2026-03-12 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 12, 2026. Line 13.
PLAINTIFF THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED with leave to amend to address all issues raised in the demurrer. Defendant shall have 5 days from notice of entry of order to file an amended answer. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”