RIOS v. ESQUIBEL, et al.

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JULY 28, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 25CV01051

RIOS v. ESQUIBEL, et al.

(UNOPPOSED) DEFENDANT MARK ESQUIBEL’S MOTION TO QUASH DEPOSITION SUBPOENA AND FOR ISSUANCE OF PROTECTIVE ORDER

The unopposed motion is denied. The motion was not served. (Proofs of Unsuccessful Service, May 29, 2026 and May 14, 2026.)

No. 24CV02816

HERNANDEZ v. GENERAL MOTORS

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file first amended complaint is granted. Amended complaint shall be filed no later than August 14, 2026. On May 22, 2026, this Court continued these hearings and ordered the parties to provide supplemental briefing addressing the Court’s concerns with the year and a half delay in bringing the motion to amend. Supplemental briefing was due by plaintiff on June 25, 2026, and by defendant on July 16, 2026. Plaintiff complied and