| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion To Remove Case To Superior Court - Unlimited Civil Division
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679852 - November 21, 2025 Hearing date: November 21, 2025 Case number: CUD25679852 Case title: YEVA, INC. VS. DAYSI O. ROMERO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679852 | Case Title: | | YEVA, INC. VS. DAYSI O. ROMERO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Remove Case To Superior Court - Unlimited Civil Division | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 21, 2025. Line 11. DEFENDANT DAYSI ROMERO Motion To Remove Case To Superior Court - Unlimited Civil Division is DENIED.
This motion is, in effect, a motion to reclassify this unlawful detainer action from limited to unlimited jurisdiction. The sole basis for this motion is that Defendant Romero has filed a separate civil action against Plaintiff, case name and number not identified, in which Defendant Romero claims damages in excess of the cap for limited jurisdiction.
However, in this unlawful detainer action, Plaintiff Yeva Inc. seeks possession of the premises and incidental unlawful detainer damages which Plaintiff asserts do not and will not exceed $35,000.00. Based upon these claims by Plaintiff Yeva Inc., the only party whose pleading seeks monetary damages in this unlawful detainer action, limited jurisdiction is the proper classification. The classification of this unlawful detainer action does not limit Defendant Romero's potential recovery in her separate civil action. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”