DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681706 - May 20, 2026 Hearing date: May 20, 2026 Case number: CUD26681706 Case title: EAH INC. VS. MAY K. CHEUNG Case Number: | | CUD26681706 | Case Title: | | EAH INC. VS. MAY K. CHEUNG | Court Date: | | 2026-05-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 20, 2026. Line 12.
PLAINTIFF EAH INC. DEMURRER to ANSWER to COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED as to Affirmative Defenses #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, and #11 with leave to amend. Defendant pleads legal conclusions in their Answer without sufficient facts, but can cure with an Amended Answer with sufficient facts. =(501/DWH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”