DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24618593·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

DIANA ZUNIGA VS. CARMEN A. GONZALEZ ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

Hearing date
Jul 24, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Adjudication rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffDIANA ZUNIGA
DefendantCARMEN A. GONZALEZ

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 24, 2026. Line 3.2. PLAINTIFF DIANA ZUNIGA AN INDIVIDUAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION is DENIED. Motion for summary adjudication as to the issues pertaining to the cause of action for partition by sale is denied in light of the ruling on the motion for determination of value and Partition of Real Property Act. The motion for summary adjudication as to the issue pertaining to the cause of action for conversion is denied. Triable issues of fact exist as to the amount of damages.

Fact 21. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share