DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679523·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 6 months agoGRANTED

JANE JIAO ET AL VS. MEI ZHI LUO ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hearing date
Feb 6, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJANE JIAO
PlaintiffSERGIO FLORENCIO
DefendantMEI ZHI LUO

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679523 - February 6, 2026 Hearing date: February 6, 2026 Case number: CUD25679523 Case title: JANE JIAO ET AL VS. MEI ZHI LUO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679523 | Case Title: | | JANE JIAO ET AL VS. MEI ZHI LUO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-06 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 6, 2026. Line 10.

PLAINTIFF JANE JIAO, SERGIO FLORENCIO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is GRANTED. Defendants' declarations in opposition do not show the existence of any triable issue of material fact. Prevailing party to prepare an order in compliance with CCP 437c(g).=(501/REQ)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share